Every morning, Shri
Husband and I share the newspaper. Amicably, with minimum squabbling. Because
what one chooses to read in it doesn’t match what the other is interested in.
He
reads about how NaMo is stretching his promise, taking his own sweet time
deciding about the One Rank One Pension (google OROP if you want to know more),
why Clinton of Monica fame and Hillary, his missus, haven’t retired from
politics, who’s buying Pakistan’s nuclear knowledge and which IPL team earns
how much.
I,
on the other hand, avoid boring political and sports headlines and check when/whether
our village will have a power shut-down, whether the three-legged calf born in
the veterinary hospital survived a complex surgery and what the cost of a
sea-plane ride on the Mandovi will be. Besides, I read about who’s recently
died/had a baby, the latest supermarkets opening on the main road near our
house, etc. (No longer do people call them shops/stores. We even have
mini-super-markets.)
But there are times when our interests overlap. It must
happen with all long-suffering spouses: shared irritations result in similar
dislikes. In our case, silly television serials are one such. Don’t get me
wrong, we share likes, too: silent non-communication, for instance, through
long summer evenings.
We
have another common interest: when it comes to sharing news or reading snippets
from paragraphs, we like hunting for grammatical slip-ups. Sadly, there are so
many of them (slip-ups, not common interests) these days that we’ve reached a
stage where we scout for grammatically correct usage instead. For example,
the other day, some sub actually knew the difference between hung (a picture on
a wall) and hanged (by the neck until dead). We thought we should write to the
editor to compliment the sub, until we realized that the editor might be
clueless her/himself.
Occasionally,
we read about the same topic beyond the headlines. It happened twice this week.
First: for over a
hundred years, since 1914, no one had seen a blue whale off the Sindhudurg
coast, and a group of scientists saw a mother and calf last week. I quote from
a news report: “… whales were spotted recently between March and May. The
researchers (of the Konkan Cetacean Research Team) also spotted four Bryde's
whales during the period. The cetacean population study team has been deployed
… for the past six months under the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
project on Mainstreaming Coastal and Marine Biodiversity. It also sighted 687
dolphins, of which 153 individual dolphins were identified because of distinct
features such as their fins.”
“Blue whales are the largest mammals in the world,”
Shri Husband said. As if I didn’t know.
I read on: “According to N Vasudevan, Chief
Conservator of Forests, Mangrove Cell, they were seen near Kunkeshwar, 2.7 km
offshore at a depth of 16 m. ...calls for immediate study as to why such a
large species is moving close to land…regular whale-watching activities are
going to be initiated across the Sindhudurg coast without disturbing the
habitat of the whales. These spots can become a tourist attraction if such
mammals are spotted often.”
He (Shri Husband, not Vasudevan) couldn’t help
interrupting: “Tourists? Poor endangered creatures.” I told you, we sometimes agree. (The ‘poor
endangered creatures’ was in reference to the whales, not the tourists, though
in Goa that might happen if we don’t tackle the garbage/public transport
issues).
“So close to Goa,” I continued. “There
are fewer
than 10,000 blue whales on this planet and a live sighting — that too a mother
and calf — that’s rare.”
We both nodded our heads agreeably at
each other for a couple of seconds before we realized how abnormal they (the
moments of agreement, not our heads) were.
The second report came to us orally,
didn’t really make it to the newspapers we read, but was worthy of discussion
between us. Opposite the fire-brigade ground in Panaji, tucked inside a
non-descript government residential colony is Hamara School for street
children. It’s not really a school. Run by a bunch of passionate and dedicated
women for the last almost two decades, this institution feeds, shelters and
educates offspring of very poor labourers. Volunteer driven, its funds come
from kind hearts. A part of those funds are used for paying the fees of some of
the brighter children, who have been admitted into regular schools. This year,
five ‘inmates’ appeared for the tenth boards. All five passed. That’s
remarkable, considering that they have none of the benefits that even
lower-lower middle-class children do, often not even parental affection. One of
the five, a girl, scored 84%.
“Not bad, not bad at all, eh?” quipped
Shri Husband looking at me. From his expression I knew he was recalling my
marks of yore. I had once hidden my old report-cards in a suitcase. Stupid of
me, because Shri Husband found them, read their contents: they have provided
him with mirth (and me with gross annoyance) ever since.
Please note, Shri Husband’s ‘not bad’ is
actually equal to ‘very good’. He understates.
We both agreed, though, that the ones
with the lesser marks, who most likely would join vocational/technical courses,
were the ones to help out with fees/ facilities. We do agree at times, like I
said.
Our eyes may be attracted to different
headlines, but in between our heads and the lines we read, sometimes our
interests match.
Feedback:
sheelajaywant@yahoo.co.in
No comments:
Post a Comment